
The question is then should any society exercise the prerogative to cast out transgressors of the social contract? Yes, with certain conditions. Everyone should agree to and understand the social contract and the consequences of non-compliance. We do not do currently do this. The social contract is an ambiguous lecture in some philosophy or social science class, if that. We have to clearly define what is expected of a citizen and what they get in return. They can then opt in or out. Opting out means they physically remove themselves from society and relocate to another. Opting in means that they understand and accept the social contract. Like any contract, if they are not in compliance they accept the consequences. The remaining Boston Marathon terrorist should be taken out and executed. Such severe violations of the social contract are without redemption. The shoplifter should be remanded and the social contract reviewed and renewed. The white collar criminal that steals billions of dollars and can't provide restitution should also be executed. The recidivists need to be judged on the cost of their crimes, the cost of incarceration, and their ability to provide restitution. Nature evolves in part because of natural selection. Society can evolve partially using the same principal. This is in no way tied to either Eugenics or Social Darwinism.
No comments:
Post a Comment