The Three Tenets of Existential Terrorism

Words are not things or actions. They are vibrations of the air molecules or squiggles on a page. Mistaking words for reality is the mistake that puts politicians in office and sells all of the products, religions, and systems of government on the planet. Saying "Tree" is no more a tree than saying "I love you" means that someone loves you. To perceive reality as it is, one must accept that words are a vehicle for the transference of our perception of reality, not reality itself.
God is dead. I killed him (it, them, her, et al) on November 5th, 1991. Justifiable Homicide. The idea that the universe is run by some cosmic supra-hero concept of ourselves is absurd and unproven. The idea that the creator of the universe put us here in these bodies to satisfy some moral experiment is offensive. The God question; "What are we doing here?", may or may not be valid. At this time, we are here because the physical laws of the universe are not completely against our existence. Our short time of consciousness would be far better served ensuring our survival rather than posturing before some misanthropic cosmic deity.
The only government, the only rule of law, is economics. However our societies are structured, whatever religion or ethnicity, we have all decided that those with relatively more assets have better lives than those with less relative wealth. All measured value is economic value in this system.

Friday, February 6, 2009

Christianity Explained


Christianity is the belief that some cosmic Jewish Zombie can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him that you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a "rib-woman" was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Short Term Morality


Moral action is not only derived from its consequences on individual and collective basis, but from the point of view of near and distant consequences for the future. At this time it may be morally acceptable to access energy from nuclear fission in order to prolong our fossil fuel allocation and reduce the pollutants associated with their burning. It is immoral to leave to future generations tons of poisonous waste that we are unable to safely reintroduce into the environment. Human Beings have a very short lifetime in comparison to the half-life of many elements. It is difficult to appreciate or care about a remote future when current needs have to be met. Short-term morality will eventually handcuff future generations of Human Beings with a continually degrading quality of life. I will certainly not live to face the problem of nuclear waste disposal. I will not suffer the most drastic effects of an increase in greenhouse gases. I will simply not live enough years to have these and other problems affect my life drastically. If I address these problems within my lifetime in order to lessen their future effects, I will certainly have to make some choices that will affect my lifestyle in a negative way. I would have to bear a future burden in the present time. Why should I?